A cognitive light cone is a way of describing the effective horizon of an experiencing mind: the total range of events, facts, meanings, and possibilities that can, even in principle, matter to a given subject at a given moment. Borrowing its name from physics, where a light cone defines the region of spacetime that can causally influence an event, the cognitive light cone marks the boundary within which information can be perceived, remembered, inferred, or imagined by a mind. This boundary is not fixed. It expands with learning, tools, language, culture, and technology, and contracts with ignorance, distraction, trauma, or cognitive overload. What lies inside the cone is actionable and meaningful; what lies outside is not false or unreal, but simply inaccessible or irrelevant to the subject’s present cognitive state. Every belief, decision, fear, hope, and intention arises from within this cone, shaped by the limited signals that can reach the mind and the interpretive frameworks it has available to make sense of them.
Seen this way, disagreements between individuals or cultures often stem not from differences in logic or intelligence, but from differently shaped cognitive light cones. Each person inhabits a unique intersection of sensory reach, historical knowledge, social position, emotional salience, and conceptual vocabulary, which determines what they can notice and care about. Technologies such as writing, mathematics, telescopes, statistics, and networks radically widen the cognitive light cone, allowing minds to coordinate with distant events, abstract systems, and future consequences far beyond direct experience. At the same time, algorithms, propaganda, and attention economies can artificially narrow the cone, amplifying certain signals while obscuring others. The concept of a cognitive light cone thus provides a unifying way to think about epistemology, ethics, and politics: moral responsibility depends on what could reasonably fall within one’s cone; wisdom involves learning how to expand it without losing coherence; and progress can be understood as the collective enlargement and alignment of our overlapping cognitive light cones, allowing societies to perceive and respond to realities that were once effectively invisible.
Bioelectric Networks
An Interface to the Plasticity and Potential of the Agential Material of Life
Michael Levin argues that life is not built merely from genes and chemistry, but from networks of bioelectric intelligence. Cells remember goals, coordinate across scales, and solve problems like minds. By rewriting these electrical “pattern memories,” medicine could heal cancer, regrow organs, and unlock a future where biology is programmed by meaning, not molecules.
Consciousness, Biology, Universal Mind, Emergence, Cancer Research
Biology’s deepest truths don’t live at the molecular bottom. Michael Levin argues that intelligence, goals, and selves emerge across scales: cells learn, tissues navigate, and cancer shrinks a collective mind’s horizon. Life is intelligence embodied—defined by the size of what it can care about, remember, and become.